Vol. 16 No. 31 • July 29 - August 4, 2010 Hamilton - Niagara's Independent Voice - Online Edition


Follow us on    
 
 
Advertisement
Local Guides














STUDENTS CAN STRIKE BACK



by View
March 16 - 22, 2006
In early March, over 9,000 teachers at Ontario’s colleges walked off the job forcing 150,000 students in the province out of class indefinitely. Given the timing, many believe that teachers are striking during this crucial juncture in the academic year to get an agreement they would not get otherwise. Caught in the clash between management and the union, the students are suffering the most. Greg Narby is a full–time professor at Humber College. He says the reason for the strike being called now is simply, “Strategy. The union knows we have more leverage if we go now with graduation in May.” One of a handful of teachers dead set against the strike, Narby feels there’s no way students can benefit from halted negotiations and suspended classes. “Right now, they’re being used as pawns.” “Students don’t want a strike,” states Tyler Charlebois, Director of Advocacy for the College Student Alliance. He says the current situation is untenable considering the two parties have been negotiating since the teachers’ contract ran out last August. “These are two sides made up of mature adults; surely they can reach a fair settlement so students can get back in the classroom.” No one knows when the strike will end and what repercussions it could have. Some teachers have taken on supplemental employment while classes are out, sending a mixed message to students who’ve been told by college administrators to keep working on assignments. With so little information to go on, most students are playing it safe and using what resources are available to hand in projects they know won’t be marked for some time. While they may not be saying much about when they’ll get back to class, the teachers claim the strike is not about workload or even pay, but “quality of education,” a dubious claim given the requests outlined in their March 6 proposal to College management. In the proposition, the union demanded teaching contract hours be cut from 14 to 12 per week, a salary increase of four per cent a year for the next two years and an elimination of the two lowest pay scale levels for all teacher categories. But wait a minute, don’t these people only work 36 weeks a year? In a world where most people don’t experience job security, two– month paid vacations, or raises every six months, how bad off can teachers be? Savvy to the spin, many students feel there’s absolutely nothing wrong on college campuses and the “quality of education” is, well, just fine. The class sizes are appropriate, teachers are accessible and those enrolled are happy with the programs offered. “I personally feel college class sizes are okay,” remarks Brad Weber, a Television Broadcasting student at Mohawk. He says that professorial guidance is always there when needed and that steps have already been taken to reduce class sizes in his program. “I would suggest putting the money it takes to reduce class sizes towards keeping equipment current and relevant. Make that a higher priority than class sizes and students will feel like they’re getting more out of their tuition.” College management maintains that the school year is not in jeopardy and that students will get what they’ve paid for. They plan to reveal their strategy for getting the year completed sometime next week. However, with the teacher’s union unwilling to go to the bargaining table, it is unclear how effective this plan will be considering the pesky issue of who’s going to teach the classes. At best, management’s solution sounds like hollow PR designed to ease the nerves of anxious students who are, if anything, confused. Whatever management’s plan is to keep the academic year on track, by the time it’s implemented students will have been out of school nearly a month and the problems they face because of this remain the same regardless of a solution. Particularly distressed by the strike are those transferring to university or another program. Their transcripts can’t be evaluated at other institutions until marks are in and the school year finished. With application deadlines looming, some students are concerned their education will have to be deferred. And they’re not the only ones sweating. Those planning to participate in co–ops and clinics over the summer are finding themselves similarly displaced. “It’s terrible,” Narby says of the way the students are affected. “You can’t just call these workplaces after being away and say you’re ready to come now.” For Weber, who has already lined up summer employment, class delays hit hard financially. “If school continues in the summer,” he says, “I will not only be losing income from a job I can’t work but I will be forced to pay additional rent and living expenses to stay.” Charlebois concurs that the situation is tough on those whose resources may be limited at best, “We’re talking about people who are not well–off to begin with. They certainly don’t make $76,000 salaries.” That’s the average college teacher salary in Ontario. He observes that many student budgets are constrained by seasonal employment, OSAP funds and housing availability. Throwing a strike into the middle of an academic year upsets an already precarious balance. “The majority of college students are people trying to better themselves, that’s why they go to college, they’re trying to build a better future” he elaborates. “And right now, that future has been halted.” Students who feel strongly about the strike are encouraged to get busy writing letters and making phone calls to the Premier, your MPP or the head of the teacher’s union. These people have the power to get both parties back to the table and students back into the classroom. Demand that education be made an essential service, to put an end to disruptive school–year strikes altogether. Whichever method, if the current situation has you steamed, you’ve got time to act now while school’s out. “I think it’s a bit irresponsible on their part to strike when it affects students the most,” observes Weber. “It makes sense from a bargaining point of view, but doesn’t put the needs of the client first, which is the student.” V [ SARAH VEALE]
Share on facebook twitter myspace
Comments (0)

No comments yet... be the first!

Post Your Comments:
To add a comment please log in with your account, or Sign Up for free!
 
© Copyright 2010 Dynasty Communications. All Rights Reserved.